What do you want to say with "already identified avp_db_load as the way
to do it" ?
It's exactly a direct database operations that I want to do.
Le jeudi 04 janvier 2007 à 07:57 +0100, Greger V. Teigre a écrit :
I'm not sure what you are requesting. It seems
that you already have
identified avp_db_load as the way to do it?! (You can also use exec
dependent on the load on your server) Ottendorf also has a new module
you can use for direct database operations.
g-)
inge wrote:
> Le mardi 02 janvier 2007 à 16:08 +0100, Jiri Kuthan a écrit :
>
> > At 14:39 28/12/2006, inge wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jiri,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your answer.
> > >
> > > I already use a new column since some month for SERWeb use. Is it
> > > definitively impossible to do what I want ?
> > >
>
>
> > of course it is possible, it is just that I occur to think that what I'm
suggesting
> > will cause you less pain. For example, if you upgrade to a later version of
SER,
> > you will have to be less worried about migration of your database.
> >
>
> Yes I think too. But the migration is not for the moment because of
> time. So, can you tell me more about the kind of line to test a new
> column in ser.cfg please ?
>
>
> > > Maybe I'm not clear in my
> > > explaination ?
> > >
> > > But can you tell me more about user_attrs, I don't have this table in
my
> > > base.
> > >
> > I'm possibly too focused on the new version, ottendorf, and don't
remember what
> > was (or not) in the previous one, but in any case I can only suggest you to
use
> > ottendorf. Its DB model is documented under
> >
http://www.iptel.org/ser/development/documentation
> >
> >
>
> I have something equivalent I think with usr_preferences. But for
> update, it's the same problem, the time. :/
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>