--On 25 March 2004 14:40 +0100 Jiri Kuthan jiri@iptel.org wrote:
Not necessarily. For instance consider UA1 and UA2 are identical UAs on different DSL lines. They get dynamic IP. The DSLAM reboots. Lines come back up slowly. If ser gets a valid register request for UA1, it seems to me it should remove all trace of the old IP address ASAP, as "I am here" rather implies "I am not there (where there != here)".
How would you like to distinguish a parallel registration from from reregistration behind a changed IP address?
May be I am missing the point, but on an identical username registering in two places, in my application at least, I'd like only the last to count. If what you are saying is that you want to be able to support multiple simultaneous registrations of the same user at different IP addresses, that's fine, but I would guess that is probably not the most common application.
[note I did not suggest that a second registration with the same IP address should overwrite the previous u/n at that IP address; I meant the old IP address entry for UA1 should be erased, not that the old UA entry (UA2)s against the IP should be erased]
Alex