Sure
RPID is Remote-Party-Id: field in SIP that tell to outgoing GW what value and setting put in CallerID when GW will terminate call to .. whatever
Read this:
Readme for module auth_db Readme for module Auth URL: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122 t/122t13/ftsipext.htm
May be it not best document, but it will tell you what is rpid and why you need it
In short: You put in ser: modparam("auth", "rpid_prefix", "Name <sip:") modparam("auth", "rpid_suffix", "@sip.frontlineglobal.net;user=phone>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off")
Name can be any, screen=yes means CallerID is trusted, some carried sekip it if see screen=no, privacy=off means who CLI to remote party (on or full - caller id blocking)
This is for kind of static thing, and I did not find way (almost half year ago) to make it dynamic.., per customer, per call
Then u do:
append_rpid_hf(); on INVITE
and then SER will take value that It received from database during authorize and append prefix/suffix and send it in SIP header.
README is quite good, just read it and you will how exact idea how to use it
-----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces@iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Charles Wang Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 12:41 PM To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Manipulate from_uri
Dear Paul:
I am a new user of SER sip. And would you please tell me an explain about what the RPID is??
I want to control the call to PSTN with B2BUA of vovida or Asterisk.
Best Regard Charles
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:33:26 -0500, Java Rockx javarockx@gmail.com wrote:
Vitaly,
I believe you are correct that RPID is only helpful during SIP->PSTN
calls.
I'm not real familiar with B2BUA, but if I were to introduce one in to my system, does that mean I need to have all the RTP traffic pass through my network as well, or does the B2BUA only deal with SIP messaging?
Regards, Paul
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:14:18 -0500, Vitaly Nikolaev vitaly@voipsonic.com wrote:
The answer is B2BUA
There actually two ways,
First is b2bua which is nice (for me ok.. I like it :)
Second if you assign the CallerID number to device.. the real callerid,
(for
example in my network we use some fake numbers into devices and then
change
it do real callerid (did) in b2bua), then some devices, for example
SIPURA,
can send Anonymous as name in From and Contact and some GWs, will use it
and
hide callerid on outgoing call.
And third:
And there are also Remote-Party-Id: field in SIP that partially
supported by
SER and supported by most of GW and carriers, and that is probably RIGHT
way
to do that.
When PSTN GW sends call to outside of ur network, it no just skip
callerid,
u can do it but it is wrong, it make it private, so usual ppl will not
see
it but for example 911 and some toll free subscriber will see. That
right
way and that how everybody should do cli blocking.
What is wrong in this method is that if you call goes from SIP to SIP
and
you use as me fake CLI on devices, customers will see fake numbers
because
as far as I know SIP devices does not support RPID (please correct me if
I
am wrong) so in my case I will have to use combination of N1 and N3..
-----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces@iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Java Rockx Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 7:20 AM To: Klaus Darilion Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Manipulate from_uri
Klaus,
I realize that RFC3261 says do not modify the From header, however, my question is this;
When making SIP-to-SIP calls between two subscribers on the same SIP proxy, how can one implement Caller ID Block when RPID is not usually honored by SIP UAs - since this is really for PSTN gateways?
It seems that altering the From header in this case is the only option. Have I missed something?
Regards, Paul
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:00:14 +0100, Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at wrote:
Hi Mik!
Do not modify the From: or To: URI - this is not allowed (RFC 3261)
and
will cause problems.
regards, klaus
Mik Cheez wrote:
Since I'm able to modify the URI for relaying, I would assume there would be a way to modify the FROM_URI as well. Has anyone managed
to do
this with SER acting as a proxy? Any other possible avenues to
modify
the CALLID?
Best regards
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers