Sure
RPID is Remote-Party-Id: field in SIP that tell to outgoing GW what value
and setting put in CallerID when GW will terminate call to .. whatever
Read this:
Readme for module auth_db
Readme for module Auth
URL:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122
t/122t13/ftsipext.htm
May be it not best document, but it will tell you what is rpid and why you
need it
In short:
You put in ser:
modparam("auth", "rpid_prefix", "Name <sip:")
modparam("auth", "rpid_suffix",
"(a)sip.frontlineglobal.net;user=phone>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off")
Name can be any, screen=yes means CallerID is trusted, some carried sekip it
if see screen=no, privacy=off means who CLI to remote party (on or full -
caller id blocking)
This is for kind of static thing, and I did not find way (almost half year
ago) to make it dynamic.., per customer, per call
Then u do:
append_rpid_hf(); on INVITE
and then SER will take value that It received from database during authorize
and append prefix/suffix and send it in SIP header.
README is quite good, just read it and you will how exact idea how to use it
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On
Behalf Of Charles Wang
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 12:41 PM
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Manipulate from_uri
Dear Paul:
I am a new user of SER sip. And would you please tell me an explain
about what the RPID is??
I want to control the call to PSTN with B2BUA of vovida or Asterisk.
Best Regard
Charles
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:33:26 -0500, Java Rockx <javarockx(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Vitaly,
I believe you are correct that RPID is only helpful during SIP->PSTN
calls.
I'm not real familiar with B2BUA, but if I were to introduce one in to
my system, does that mean I need to have all the RTP traffic pass
through my network as well, or does the B2BUA only deal with SIP
messaging?
Regards,
Paul
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:14:18 -0500, Vitaly Nikolaev
<vitaly(a)voipsonic.com> wrote:
>
> The answer is B2BUA
>
> There actually two ways,
>
> First is b2bua which is nice (for me ok.. I like it :)
>
> Second if you assign the CallerID number to device.. the real callerid,
(for
> example in my network we use some fake numbers
into devices and then
change
> it do real callerid (did) in b2bua), then some
devices, for example
SIPURA,
> can send Anonymous as name in From and Contact
and some GWs, will use it
and
> hide callerid on outgoing call.
>
> And third:
>
> And there are also Remote-Party-Id: field in SIP that partially
supported by
> SER and supported by most of GW and carriers, and
that is probably RIGHT
way
> to do that.
>
> When PSTN GW sends call to outside of ur network, it no just skip
callerid,
> u can do it but it is wrong, it make it private,
so usual ppl will not
see
> it but for example 911 and some toll free
subscriber will see. That
right
> way and that how everybody should do cli
blocking.
>
> What is wrong in this method is that if you call goes from SIP to SIP
and
> you use as me fake CLI on devices, customers will
see fake numbers
because
> as far as I know SIP devices does not support
RPID (please correct me if
I
> am wrong) so in my case I will have to use
combination of N1 and N3..
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On
> Behalf Of Java Rockx
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 7:20 AM
> To: Klaus Darilion
> Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] Manipulate from_uri
>
> Klaus,
>
> I realize that RFC3261 says do not modify the From header, however, my
> question is this;
>
> When making SIP-to-SIP calls between two subscribers on the same SIP
> proxy, how can one implement Caller ID Block when RPID is not usually
> honored by SIP UAs - since this is really for PSTN gateways?
>
> It seems that altering the From header in this case is the only
> option. Have I missed something?
>
> Regards,
> Paul
>
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:00:14 +0100, Klaus Darilion
> <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote:
> > Hi Mik!
> >
> > Do not modify the From: or To: URI - this is not allowed (RFC 3261)
and
> > will cause problems.
> >
> > regards,
> > klaus
> >
> > Mik Cheez wrote:
> > > Since I'm able to modify the URI for relaying, I would assume there
> > > would be a way to modify the FROM_URI as well. Has anyone managed
to do
> > > this with SER acting as a proxy? Any
other possible avenues to
modify
the CALLID?
Best regards
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers