-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Sure I'll... ;)
Edson.
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax(a)portaone.com>
To: "Edson Gellert Schubert" <egschubert(a)ig.com.br>
Cc: "Lista SER - IPTEL" <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER + Proxy + NAT
I am testing a new version of rtp proxy now, which
would allow it
to be used as a rtp bridge between local network and public one. I
plan to release it somewhere at the next week, so that stay
tuned.
-Maxim
Edson Gellert Schubert wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all...
>
> I look through the list's archives, but an not finding info to help me.
>
> The goal is use SER but not instaled in the GW/FW (it's not an
acceptable
> option, well it's acceptable, but not for
now). So I'm trying to put the
SER
> in the Internal LAN (it could be installed in a
DMZ also). So the
question
> is if there is any proxy that could be putted on
the GW/FW to handle
> incomming calls (INVITEs) and forward it correctly to the SER machine
taken
> over the NAT issues?
>
> I already look at SIProxd and RTProxy, but the first didn't forward
> incomming calls, and the second demands that it be instaled, with SER on
the
> GW/FW. I also am looking at SERMediaProxy
(RTProxy alternative) but the
> documentations aren't sufficient detailed to answer my question. Any
help
would be
appreciated.
Edson.
#=============================
f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0
iQA/AwUBQBhxkDdMQB7Du1dpEQLaBwCgi6SrH3d6UtOdAnHDu+Tyfydn1BQAn0Md
VEsHHSQR/bgoF/eAi2yh2yW9
=Y13k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0
iQA/AwUBQBlD7DdMQB7Du1dpEQKF3ACgxdCkOeHe8JFZp2ytrutYm4hPN58AoK7E
h5QJoF+W+ibGm4JNkGbp5LcW
=oDMU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----