Hi All
I had a lot of problems with STUN and symmetric NAT. The thing is that it does not always work with symmetric NAT. That would be mostly routers based on Linux IPTABLES.
-----Original Message----- From: users-bounces@lists.openser.org [mailto:users-bounces@lists.openser.org] On Behalf Of Bogdan-Andrei Iancu Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:42 AM To: pezhman_lali@yahoo.com Cc: users@lists.openser.org Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] stun
Hi Pezhman,
If I'm not wrong STUN cannot cross symmetric nats - it is one of its limitations.
Regards, Bogdan
Pezhman Lali wrote:
--- On Mon, 6/9/08, Pezhman Lali pezhman_lali@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Pezhman Lali pezhman_lali@yahoo.com Subject: stun To: pezhman.lali@gmail.com Date: Monday, June 9, 2008, 6:02 PM Dear, does setting the ip of stun server in the sip-phones, behind the symmetric nat, make the problem ? my experience with stund 0.96, said yes. the stun server, can detects the type of nats properly, but the sip-phones behind the un-symmetric nat, can not register, or one-way calling.
????
Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users