RE: [Serusers] UAs not respecting Record Route

At 10:11 PM 2/15/2004, Samy Touati wrote: Samy, that's all ok too since the UAC is loose router (you find more information in RFC3261; the basic concept of loose routing is not to stir target address in request-uri with record-routing information). The other case you referred to (proxy in r-uri, destination in Route) is ok too, it is RFC2543 strict-routing UAC, whose messages should be routed eventually the same way. That's probably the most confusing SIP issue. That's not ok -- I don't know yet why, it may be an error in SER: both the ACK (frame #1151) and config files look reasonable to me, just the outgoing ACK (frame #1155) is misconcepted somehow: 1) it includes wrong URI, 2) transport destination is different from that inRoute in #1151 and 3) there is no P_Hint at all (there should be some -- if you are using the script you send me, there is append_hf(P-Hint) before each t_relay....) -- neither does the forwarded INVITE (#513) include some which really surprises me. Are you sure the message dumps were generating using exactly the same config file you sent? -jiri (BTW -- better try to filter the traffic samples you send -- it is ok if I filter the hundreds of messages to www.babycenter.com, but you might have some privacy issues ;)