Steven Wu wrote:
>
> Hi Victor,
>
> Is it version same as the SIP proxy on Iptel.org?
HEAD version is running there.
> Actually, the situation is I'm handling a bug in my SIP UA that iptel
> SIP proxy dropped our ACK
> in double hold case.
> Unfortunately, I can't register to public iptel SIP proxy at iptel.org
> due to our NAT box has some problem.
what kind of?
> So, I want to install a same SIP proxy at our local networking.
> Is there any special config in SIP proxy at iptel.org?
we use somewhat modified OOB.
-jiri
>
> Best regards,
> Steven Wu
>
> *From:* Victor Pascual A'vila [mailto:victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 2008-8-28 (星期四) 16:11
> *To:* Steven Wu
> *Cc:* Arun Kumar; SER Users
> *Subject:* Re: 答复: [Serusers] SER Version
>
> 2008/8/28 Steven Wu <Steven.Wu@teleca.com>
>>
>> Which is the up to date SER version?
>
> Version 2.0.0: http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/ser/2.0.0/src/ser-2.0.0_src.tar.gz
>
> Jan also created a tag in the cvs repository. You can use the
> following command to get version 2.0.0: cvs co -r v_2_0_0 sip_router
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Victor Pascual A'vila
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers@lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers