18 Nov
2008
18 Nov
'08
9:44 a.m.
Alex Balashov schrieb:
Klaus Darilion wrote:
No. This is fine. A response need not to have the totag (for
compatibility with the old SIP RFC) and actually transaction matching is
based on branch id in Via header, dialog matching is based on
callid+fromatg+totag
klaus
A dirty hack (but very well working) is to use a
regular expression in
reply route and remove the to-tag from all 1xx responses - so the
softswitch can learn the tag only with the 200 ok.
Won't that cause the provisional response to not be matched to the right
transaction?