18 Nov
2008
18 Nov
'08
8:44 a.m.
Alex Balashov schrieb:
Klaus Darilion wrote:
A dirty hack (but very well working) is to use a regular expression in reply route and remove the to-tag from all 1xx responses - so the softswitch can learn the tag only with the 200 ok.
Won't that cause the provisional response to not be matched to the right transaction?
No. This is fine. A response need not to have the totag (for compatibility with the old SIP RFC) and actually transaction matching is based on branch id in Via header, dialog matching is based on callid+fromatg+totag
klaus