[SR-Users] Re: Standard on RTP ports

Hi, @Richard Edmands, what do you mean by "RTPengine has Cuda offloading..."? Can you share more references to that? Thank you, Stefan ------------------------------ *From:* Richard Edmands via sr-users <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 13, 2023 11:06:08 AM *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List *Cc:* Richard Edmands *Subject:* [SR-Users] Re: Standard on RTP ports Howdy, So you’ve got the reserved ports range 0-1023. Then there’s a few other brackets. In Linux there are kernel parameters to adjust these ranges, but it has been a few years. If we’re really at the stage where we are looking at increasing the size of the range, then looking into these parameters is also worth looking into on these rtp boxes. Typically a box wouldn’t be processing anywhere near the limits to be genuinely worth considering. But now that RTPEngine has Cuda offloading… sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> wrote: for RTCP. There is no standard that I am aware of, but common practice is for the lower bound to be UDP 8000. The upper bound varies, but can be as high as the logical maximum of 65535. sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> wrote: RFC, what port range should be used for RTP traffic, how RTP ports are selected during SIP call negotiation? to the sender! the sender! __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: