Re: [SR-Users] parallel forking and 30x

Daniel, we do seem to have a problem here, the get_redirects() function can be used from the FAILURE_ROUTE only, not from per branch failure route ("Command cannot be used in the block"). Does it mean that uac_redirect module needs an update? Andrew On 02/18/2014 10:38 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > starting with 4.1, you can have per branch failure routing block: > > http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.1.x/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_on_branch… > > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 18/02/14 10:28, Andreas Granig wrote: >> Hi, >> >> What is the intended behaviour from a general point of view if you get a >> 1xx on one branch and a 30x on another branch for a parallel fork? >> >> From my understanding, the 30x is a final reply, so it's kept in tm >> until all other branches are finished, then it enters failure-route with >> the highest error code (e.g. a 487 if you cancel the other branch). >> >> What I actually want is intercepting the 30x and send another INVITE to >> the Contact of the 30x in the failure route. This works fine if you only >> have one branch, but it doesn't enter failure route for 30x if you have >> another active branch (e.g. in ringing state). Would it be possible to >> create a new branch directly from the reply route, or force to enter >> failure route for a specific reply/branch? >> >> Andreas