8 Jun
2006
8 Jun
'06
11:56 a.m.
Hi Ovidiu,
when starting the rtpproxy, have you configured both addresses?
regards,
bogdan
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
Can anyone shed some light on how openser should poke
rtpproxy in
order to get the proper IP address when a bridged rtp session is
established?
thx,
-ovi
On 6/5/06, Ovidiu Sas <sip.nslu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to get openser to act as an SBC using the mediaproxy
module and
the rtpproxy (built from the cvs).
openser is configured to run in a multihomed mode.
I'm starting rtpproxy in debug mode: rtpproxy -f -l
10.110.1.174/10.111.5.15
The rtpproxy is binding to both IPs.
When an INVITE is received on the 10.110 interface, I call
force_rtp_proxy().
Regrdless of the "i" or "e" parameter that I pass to the
force_rtp_proxy(),
the rtpproxy is replying with the same IP.
output from rtpproxy if force_rtp_proxy("i"):
received command "UI 4a2fabe1-24c7fe03(a)10.110.50.4 10.110.48.7 10046
60e4ff4a-soma;1"
new session 4a2fabe1-24c7fe03(a)10.110.50.4, tag 60e4ff4a-soma;1
requested,
type strong
new session on a port 35000 created, tag 60e4ff4a-soma;1
pre-filling caller's address with 10.110.48.7:10046
sending reply "35000 10.110.1.174
"
output from rtpproxy if force_rtp_proxy("e"):
received command "UE 44709fe7-423307f6(a)10.110.49.134 10.110.48.7 10012
1f713156-soma;1"
new session 44709fe7-423307f6(a)10.110.49.134, tag 1f713156-soma;1
requested,
type strong
new session on a port 35002 created, tag 1f713156-soma;1
pre-filling caller's address with 10.110.48.7:10012
sending reply "35002 10.110.1.174
"
The IP address sent out in the outgoing INVITE is 10.110.1.174
instead of
10.111.5.15.
Is this the expected behaviour from the rtpproxy?
Do I need to pass other params to the force_rtp_proxy() function?
Regards,
-ovi
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users