2009/7/7 Henning Westerholt <henning.westerholt(a)1und1.de>de>:
if i remember correctly one of the original ideas
behind the nat-traversal
module was to consolidate the helper functionality needed to support nat
traversal into one module, instead of having two more or less redundant
implementations in nathelper and mediaproxy modules. Not sure how the
current state of integration is at the moment.. I also think that a clear
separation of efforts would be a good thing.
If i understand the module docs correctly then nat_traversal seems to
support better and/ or more efficient nat keep alive, among others. Its not
restricted to only ping users from location table, for example.
I use nat-traversal module and it's MUCH MUCH more powerful than
nathelper, for sure.
It allows NAT keepalive for non registered users when they are in a
INVITE or SUBSCRIBE dialog.
Alex, please, take a look to nat-traversal full documentation.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>