2 Dec
2003
2 Dec
'03
10:56 p.m.
Oops.. I have the second fifo as /tmp/vm_ser_fifo. I was just messing around
changing those while I was testing. So, it is not working with a different
fifo too.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nils Ohlmeier [mailto:nils@iptel.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 3:44 PM
To: sesha(a)iic.com
Cc: serusers
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Re: voicemail config
I guess your second Ser is not starting, because then path and name of the
fifo is the same for both Ser instances.
Nils
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 21:27, Sesha B wrote:
to
Yeah, I'm listening on the loopback. I observed
something interesting.
When
I stop the first instance, the second instance (Which
earlier used to go
to
the voicemail directly), is also not working. It works
only if I change
the
port back to 5060 on the second instance of SER. I
dont understand where I
am doing wrong. I'm attaching my ser.cfg and ser-vm.cfg. Please help.
Thank
you.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nils Ohlmeier [mailto:nils@iptel.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 2:33 PM
To: sesha(a)iic.com; Jan Janak; Mario Kolberg
Cc: Klaus Darilion; serusers
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Re: voicemail config
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 20:35, Sesha B wrote:
> I am running two instances of SER on the same machine. One is the
regular
config running
on 5060 and the other is the voicemail config running on
5090. I also have a different fifo file for both of the configs. I dont
see
> any traffic on the port 5090 at all. I mean, the call is not forwarded the voicemail.
Please help. Thank you.
Are you sure that you listen on the correct interface? Loopback interface
in this case, e.g. 'ngrep -d lo port 5090'.
Regards
Nils