actually xml-rpc and various AVP tracks should have been mentioned for sake of completeness. Like with the other ones: that's good featrues but they are sporadically documented.
-jiri
At 15:33 17/07/2006, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
I would say that SER has been capable of making major design steps, such as sanity overhaul of the underlying database structure, TCP processing, timers, select operators, and so on. The down-side is that those features have not yet been documented.
-jiri
At 12:06 16/07/2006, Greger V. Teigre wrote:
Well, trying to be a bit objective:
- It depends on your needs
- OpenSER has a more aggressive release policy (more newer features),
meaning that openser contains more functions and modules than ser 3. Latest SER is 0.9.x and is extremely stable 4. Openser 0.9.x and ser 0.9.x are (almost) close to identical. From 0.10 they start to diverge. SER 0.10 is not yet released, OpenSER has reached 1.1 5. The type of features/functionality included in SER and openser are likely to be quite different 6. OpenSER is currently better documented in the latest version
Have a look at the onsip.org Getting Started guide for more detail on history. g-)
Chahn John Kim wrote:
I am a SER starter. I have seen many subjects related to Openser.
Can someone shed a light on what are the differences between these? And even some insights to suggest which may be better than the other?
We are planing to start business service shortly and we appreciate any inputs on which SIP server infrastructure provides better performance and scalability.
Thank you in advance.
John K.
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/