Hi,
you cannot use add_path(), but by creating your own Path header this works, e.g.:
append_hf("Path: <sip:term@HOSTNAME:"+PORT+";lr>\r\n");
(from our P-CSCF config)
Then your Proxy should also evaluate the DNS-SRV records.
Kind regards,
Carsten
--
Carsten Bock
CEO (Geschäftsführer)
============================================================= Die ng-voice GmbH ist auf der Kamailio World 2013, 16./17. April 2013
=> http://conference.kamailio.com/k01/=============================================================
ng-voice GmbH
Schomburgstr. 80
D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
http://www.ng-voice.com
mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
Office +49 40 34927219
Fax +49 40 34927220
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189
Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
Ust-ID: DE279344284
Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben:
http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
Hi All,
Given a situation where there are multiple registrars, behind a single load balancer, sharing the same location table in DB, I understand that Path can be used to ensure everything works nicely with clients behind NAT. So, if UA1 is registered on P1, UA2 on P2, and UA1 calls UA2... P1 performs lookup, sees path and sends via P2.
What about situations where the distribution between registrars is being handled client-side through DNS SRV, not a load balancer? Path cannot be used then, right? As I understand it, in this instance add_path() will do nothing, is this correct?
Thanks in advance,
Charles
www.sipcentric.com
Follow us on twitter @sipcentric
Sipcentric Ltd.
Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592. Registered
office: Unit 10 iBIC, Birmingham Science Park, Holt Court South, Birmingham B7 4EJ._______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users