I did a basic test (acc with parameters as in default kamailio.cfg) and
invite is accounted ok. I used master branch, but there is no difference
with acc from 4.2.
Can you run with debug=3 and see all the log messages, maybe you get a
further hint from there.
Also, you can try with clone_msg parameter set to 0 - it is one of
latest additions to acc module, just be sure you don't have some corner
case situation...
Cheers,
Daniel
On 24/12/14 15:23, Muhammad Shahzad wrote:
After upgrade to version 4.2.1-a2aa22, result is
same.
Thank you.
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Muhammad Shahzad
<shaheryarkh(a)gmail.com <mailto:shaheryarkh@gmail.com>> wrote:
Looking at log level 3 logs, i see when INVITE has been
authenticated ACC module creates the dialog,
--
DEBUG: acc [acc_cdr.c:726]: cdr_on_create(): dialog '0xa5936e70'
created!
--
But acc callback is only triggered AFTER 200 OK of BYE request,
--
DEBUG: acc [acc_logic.c:644]: tmcb_func(): acc callback called for
t(0xa591d840) event type 2, reply
code 200
--
Between these two log lines there is no log from acc module.
Thank you.
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Muhammad Shahzad
<shaheryarkh(a)gmail.com <mailto:shaheryarkh@gmail.com>> wrote:
See attached SIP trace.
Note, i have obfuscated source and destination number and IPs
etc. due to privacy reasons.
Thank you.
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Muhammad Shahzad
<shaheryarkh(a)gmail.com <mailto:shaheryarkh@gmail.com>> wrote:
OK, i will upgrade my staging server and do some testing.
The acc module does not post records anywhere, neither
syslog nor db. The problem is happening to all calls (not
any specific call).
Regarding the FROM header, the only change done is to add
"+" to callerid (after replacing 00 if present), this is
extensively tested feature in past 6 months.
I have analyzed all the SIP packets in call using ngrep,
they all seem perfectly fine. All packets (request +
reply) are correctly received and forwarded by kamailio.
Unfortunately i deleted them and need to get new trace. I
will send it to you in the afternoon.
Thank you.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
you can try with latest git branch 4.2 and see the
results.
At a quick look between the version you reported to
work and the new version you run, I couldn't spot a
commit that could be the reason.
Do you get the acc record in syslog for INVITE?
How do you set the values for replacing From header?
If you load from database, be sure the values are
valid. I see the uac module complains about restoring
operation. It might be the reason for the issues --
config could be ok, but the subscriber data wrong.
You should save the traffic for a while and check the
packets for missing records -- you can use tools such
as tcpdump, sipgrep, ngrep to store the traffic in a
file for later analysis. When you find a missing
record, search in the file with the sip traffic and
see if something is broken there.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 23/12/14 21:45, Muhammad Shahzad wrote:
Hi,
About 3 weeks ago i upgraded one of my production
server with latest stable kamailio version
4.2.1-fad00a. Now i am getting a lot of complaints
about missing CDR events in ACC table. I observe
following problems,
1. There are only BYE records in acc table, no record
for INVITE or ACK.
2. In kamailio logs when ACK is received against 200
OK response for INVITE, i see following errors,
--
ERROR: <core> [parser/parse_from.c:113]:
parse_from_uri(): failed to parse From uri
ERROR: pv [pv_core.c:434]: pv_get_xto_attr(): cannot
parse From URI
NOTICE: <script>: [udp:<null>@1.0.0.127:5060
<http://1.0.0.127:5060>]: Call from 'you(a)kamailio.org
<mailto:you@kamailio.org>' to 'you(a)kamailio.org
<mailto:you@kamailio.org>' has been hanged up by
'<null>' at '1419364717.255484'
--
Of course all these errors are bogus, I have checked
all headers in ACK (not just FROM header), they all
seem perfectly fine and valid.
3. Then the dialog times out,
--
WARNING: dialog [dlg_handlers.c:1440]:
dlg_ontimeout(): timeout for dlg with CallID
'6D8BD23CAC65AE3C1DE1D0B531F87B8CFEAA9CB9' and tags
'1D3ECD34F5731AB845BA3064AC95BB2D'
'7f55e81e0630-100007f-13c4-6009-2440a4-5fa31570-2440a4'
--
4. Any further sequential requests complain about
"unable to find dialog", e.g.
--
NOTICE: <script>: Sequencial 'BYE' request received
from caller
ERROR: uac [replace.c:591]: restore_uri(): new URI []
shorter than old URI [sip:00xxxxxxxxxx@sip.domain.com
<mailto:sip%3A00xxxxxxxxxx@sip.domain.com>]
WARNING: dialog [dlg_handlers.c:1174]: dlg_onroute():
unable to find dialog for BYE with route param
'5ae1.d595' [7845:22877]
--
5. However the acc record for BYE is written to db
and log file,
--
NOTICE: acc [acc.c:318]: acc_log_request(): ACC:
transaction answered:
timestamp=1419364760;method=BYE;from_tag=7f55e81e0630-100007f-13c4-6009-244…
<http://sip.domain.com>;src_ip=xx.xx.xx.xx;dst_ouser=+1xxxxxxxxxx;dst_user=1xxxxxxxxxx;dst_domain=yy.yy.yy.yy
--
The same config was working fine with older version
4.2.0-97cab8. The kamailio config i am using is
pretty much standard,
--
#!define FLT_ACC 1
#!define FLT_ACCMISSED 2
#!define FLT_ACCFAILED 3
#!define FLT_DLG 4
...
modparam("acc", "early_media", 1)
modparam("acc", "report_ack", 1)
modparam("acc", "report_cancels", 1)
modparam("acc", "detect_direction", 1)
modparam("acc", "log_flag", FLT_ACC)
modparam("acc", "log_missed_flag", FLT_ACCMISSED)
modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag",
FLT_ACCFAILED)
# log to db
modparam("acc", "db_flag", FLT_ACC)
modparam("acc", "db_missed_flag", FLT_ACCMISSED)
modparam("acc", "db_url", "DBURL")
...
request_route {
# per request initial checks
route(REQINIT);
# NAT detection
route(NATDETECT);
# handle requests within SIP dialogs
route(WITHINDLG);
# CANCEL processing
if (is_method("CANCEL")) {
if (t_check_trans()) {
t_relay();
};
exit;
};
#### only initial requests (no To tag) ####
t_check_trans();
....
# account only INVITEs
if (is_method("INVITE")) {
setflag(FLT_DLG); # create dialog
setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting
setflag(FLT_ACCFAILED); # ... even if the
transaction fails
$avp(dlg_timeout) = 60;
dlg_manage();
....
}
--
Any ideas why its happening? Since it is 3 weeks old
so may be problem has already been spotted and fixed
by someone else. Otherwise let me know how can i
provide more info to help fix this issue.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users