22 aug 2013 kl. 10:07 skrev Alex Balashov abalashov@evaristesys.com:
Hello,
The options_reply() function does not answer OPTIONS pings that contain a username in the request URI. To its credit, the documentation does say that, too:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.0.x/modules/siputils.html#idp131056
The question is: why not? I do not see anything in RFC 3261 Section 11.1 ("Construction of an OPTIONS Request") that seems to rule out an OPTIONS request with a user part:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-11.1
Quite a few UAs out there, including, notably, Metaswitch, do send user parts in the OPTIONS RURI. To deal with them, I am forced to simply
sl_send_reply("200", "OK");
instead of using options_reply().
What is the underlying theory?
Guessing that a URI with a user name should be forwarded to that address. URIs pointing to the domain of the server should be responded by the server.
/O