Hello,
the error message:
Feb 21 00:11:25 csbc02 csbc[13916]: ERROR: <core> [db.c:481]:
db_use_table(): invalid parameter value
Is printed if the database table name is not given as parameter (eg,
null or empty). I pushed a patch to usrloc to print the table in the log
message, can you try with latest master (or patch from next commit) and
send again the log messages?
*
Hello,
I have a setup with 2 kamailio in active/idle, locations are shared
via dmq_usrloc, but database is also used as a cache where other
systems can access and query "real-time" data.
The config we have is:
# ----- usrloc params -----
modparam("usrloc", "db_url", DBURL)
modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 1)
modparam("usrloc", "db_load", 0)
modparam("usrloc", "db_insert_update", 1)
modparam("usrloc", "db_timer_clean", 1)
modparam("usrloc", "server_id_filter", 1)
modparam("usrloc", "timer_procs", 2)
modparam("usrloc", "timer_interval", 60)
# ----- dmq_usrloc params -----
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "enable", 1)
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "sync", 1)
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_msg_contacts", 50) # 50 contacts /
message
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_size", 10000) # 10000 contacts /
batch
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_usleep", 500000) # one batch every
500ms
With this setup, we assume:
1- almost real-time updated location info in the database.
2- as long as one of the two Kam is up, location information will not
be lost (as they will sync with each other via DMQ)
3- if both servers go down, locations are lost (as they will not
reload from database on startup).
Our tests work well with the above config, with one exception, on the
idle node, we see a lot of (only happens on the node receiving
location via dmq):
Feb 21 00:11:25 csbc02 csbc[13916]: ERROR: <core> [db.c:481]:
db_use_table(): invalid parameter value
Feb 21 00:11:25 csbc02 csbc[13916]: ERROR: usrloc [ucontact.c:1136]:
db_update_ucontact_ruid(): sql use_table failed
Feb 21 00:11:25 csbc02 csbc[13916]: ERROR: usrloc [ucontact.c:1657]:
update_contact_db(): failed to update database
I added debug logs to see if I could understand the reason:
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
[usrloc_sync.c:478]: usrloc_dmq_handle_msg(): dmq message received
from sip:usrloc@10.2.1.181:5050 <http://sip:usrloc@10.2.1.181:5050>
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
[usrloc_sync.c:423]: usrloc_dmq_execute_action(): Received DMQ_UPDATE.
Update contact info...
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
[usrloc_sync.c:75]: add_contact(): aor: 1063362
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
[usrloc_sync.c:76]: add_contact(): ci->ruid: uloc-1-5e502cd3-5629-1
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
[usrloc_sync.c:77]: add_contact(): aorhash: 928261667
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
[usrloc_sync.c:115]: add_contact(): '1063362' Not found in usrloc
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
[usrloc_sync.c:117]: add_contact(): Insert record
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: usrloc [ul_callback.h:83]:
run_ul_callbacks(): contact=0x7fe41ff41f40, callback type 1/15, id 0
entered
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
[usrloc_sync.c:800]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Callback from usrloc with type=1
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
[usrloc_sync.c:826]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Contact received from DMQ...
skip
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: ERROR: <core> [db.c:481]:
db_use_table(): invalid parameter value
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: ERROR: usrloc [ucontact.c:669]:
db_insert_ucontact(): sql use_table failed
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: ERROR: usrloc [urecord.c:598]:
insert_ucontact(): failed to insert in database
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
[usrloc_sync.c:121]: add_contact(): Insert ucontact
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
[usrloc_sync.c:124]: add_contact(): Release record
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
[usrloc_sync.c:126]: add_contact(): Unlock udomain
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: sl [sl.c:305]:
send_reply(): reply in stateless mode (sl)
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: <core>
[core/msg_translator.c:161]: check_via_address(): (10.2.1.181,
10.2.1.181, 0)
Can anyone help me understand what's the problem? I have the server_id
setting, and the modparam server_id_filter, so shouldn't the receiving
node just ignore any database tasks?
Thanks,
Joel.
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users