Re: [SR-Users] Route - loose_route

Hello, I have a strange issue here with the Route header not been respected by the Kamailio server. I'm getting the INVITE from the SBC-1, adding my own RR header (SBC-2), and send it to the SBC-3 This is the Invite I'm sending outside to the SBC-3 Proxy. ``` INVITE sip:+123456789@192.168.1.1:5060 <http://sip:+123456789@192.168.1.1:5060> SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:SBC-2:5067;transport=tls;r2=on;ftag=as2b53df6f;lr> Record-Route: <sip:SBC-1;ftag=as2b53df6f;lr> ``` I'm getting back 200OK with mirrored RR, the call is established successfully. But, the problem is with the BYE message coming from the SBC-3: ``` BYE sip:+123456789@192.168.1.2:5060 <http://sip:+123456789@192.168.1.2:5060> SIP/2.0 ROUTE: <sip:SBC-2:5067;transport=tls;r2=on;ftag=as2b53df6f;lr>,<sip:SBC-1;ftag=as2b53df6f;lr> ``` There are 2 routes within a single header. Afaik, loose_function should remove his own Route header (SBC-2) and forward the message to the next Route (SBC-1), or to the URI if there are not other Routes. But, in my case, for some reason Kamailio on SBC-2 is sending the request directly to the URI, bypassing the SBC-1.  In the logs I'm getting the following errors: *rr_do_force_send_socket(): no socket found to match second RR (sip:SBC-1) * *rr_do_force_send_socket(): second RR uri is not myself (sip:SBC-1)* * * To enforce the socket I was trying to use 'sn=interface', then I'm not getting anymore this error - but still, Kamailio sends the message directly to the URI, instead of SBC-1.  Is there anything wrong with my config, or I am missing something with the Route headers? Kamailio Version: version: kamailio 5.4.4 (x86_64/linux) bdf4e0 Thank you. _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users