Re: [Users] openser-ser-sems

Hi, I have a problem. I have a working openser server, but I want and a media server, so I decide to use sems. I put everything in this way: Openser <-------> Ser<--------->sems All things are working on the same server.Openser works on 5060 port, and ser on 6060 port. In openser.cfg I redirect to ser in this way: if (uri=~"sip:100@.*") {

t_relay("localhost:6060"); exit; }; and in ser.cfg:

if (uri=~"sip:100.*@") { if(!t_write_unix("/tmp/am_sock","conference")) { t_reply("500","error contacting sems"); }; break; };

When I dial 100 the logs of the ser contain: Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: SIP Request: Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: method: <INVITE> Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: uri: <sip:100@domain.com> Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: version: <SIP/2.0> Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: parse_headers: flags=1 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK2cec.f018b0b5.0>; state=16 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: end of header reached, state=5 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: parse_headers: this is the first via Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: After parse_msg... Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: preparing to run routing scripts... Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: parse_headers: flags=128 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bKOUUByO4Kp1q4sDNU>; state=16 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: end of header reached, state=5 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=128 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: parse_headers: this is the second via Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 69 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: DBG:maxfwd:process_maxfwd_header: value 69 decreased to 16 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: parse_headers: flags=8 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=6mVbY0KQFDRYupVP Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: end of header reached, state=29 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: parse_headers: flags=256 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: end of header reached, state=9 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [29]; uri=[sip:100@domain.com] Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: DEBUG: to body ["100" <sip:100@voip.cts.md> ] Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <INVITE> Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=232 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: found end of header Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: find_first_route: No Route headers found Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: loose_route: There is no Route HF Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==9 && [domain.com] == [127.0.0.1] Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 6060 matches port 5060 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [domain.com] == [X.X.X.X] Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 6060 matches port 5060 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==10 && [domain.com] == [172.17.6.2] Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 6060 matches port 5060 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==9 && [domain.com] == [127.0.0.1] Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 6060 matches port 5060 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [domain.com] == [X.X.X.X] Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 6060 matches port 5060 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==10 && [domain.com] == [172.17.6.2] Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 6060 matches port 5060 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: check_self: host != me Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=3 , global msg id=2 , T onfiltered=0xffffffffffffffff Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: parse_headers: flags=-1 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: parse_headers: flags=60 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=52930, isACK=0 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: SER: new INVITE Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: parse_headers: flags=-1 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: check_via_address(172.17.6.2, 172.17.6.2, 0) Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: DEBUG: reply sent out. buf=0x5d8838: SIP/2.0 1..., shmem=0x2b9b012ee768: SIP/2.0 1 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: DEBUG: _reply_light: finished Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup... Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: get_record: lookup(_sip._udp.domain.com, 33) failed Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: sip_resolvehost: no SRV record found for voip.cts.md, trying 'normal' lookup... Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: check_via_address(172.17.6.2, 172.17.6.2, 0) Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0x2b9b012ec368 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0x2b9b012ec388 Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: SER: new transaction fwd'ed Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) Oct 4 12:26:59 voip /usr/local/sbin/ser[31088]: receive_msg: cleaning up Please show me where is the problem, in openser or ser or sems? Thanks. Ion M. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Poco spazio e tanto spam? Yahoo! Mail ti protegge dallo spam e ti da tanto spazio gratuito per i tuoi file e i messaggi http://mail.yahoo.it ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users