Hi,

I am very happy with Topos and redis for such things. You should give it a try. And topos had some nice contact header features also. 

Benoit Panizzon <benoit.panizzon@imp.ch> schrieb am Do., 26. Jan. 2023, 16:01:
Hi

I'm trying to work around Route-Header and Via Issues with the two
topology hiding modules topoh and topos and trying to figure out, which
one works better for our environment.

My conclusion so far:

topos creates very clean header, but needs a database or redis. I'm
always reluctant in adding more components which could fail or cause
load.

topoh also works, but it worries me a bit that according to the manual:
https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/topoh.html#topoh.p.mask_ip
a private IP is used to mask the contact header.

I have come across a CPE which, as far as I see, is misbehaving by
ALWAYS sending a PRACK to the Hostname or IP found in the Contact
header, and ignoring Route and Via Header.

So why using a private IP as 'mask' and not the IP or Hostname of the
actual kamailio instance?

Mit freundlichen Grüssen

-Benoît Panizzon-
--
I m p r o W a r e   A G    -    Leiter Commerce Kunden
______________________________________________________

Zurlindenstrasse 29             Tel  +41 61 826 93 00
CH-4133 Pratteln                Fax  +41 61 826 93 01
Schweiz                         Web  http://www.imp.ch
______________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: