Hi,

It seems that didn't compile the new file, added in the parse_diversion.c file some log, but not show it in kamailio.log

after compile got:

version: kamailio 5.8.6 (x86_64/linux) fb71db

flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED

ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_SEND_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB

poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.

id: fb71db

compiled on 11:43:38 Jun 13 2025 with gcc 11.4.1

I am still trying to understand why not replace the old file,

if you have any Idea why, appreciate your help.

Thanks!

On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:34 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com> wrote:

I tested during development and worked fine with your example header. Do try with the development version to validate it or not, send kamailio -v if still fails along with the entire sip message used during your tests.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 12.06.25 19:37, ale Gural wrote:
Thanks for your quick response,
I replaced the new file parser_diversion.c in /src/core/parser/ and compiler again, same result.

Thanks!
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 6:48 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Can you try with latest git master branch? I pushed a commit trying to fix it, the problem was in the way the parser computed the length of the Diversion value, not considering quoted values.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 12.06.25 11:25, ale Gural via sr-users wrote:
ale Gural

12:24 PM (0 minutes ago)

to Benoit

I am using KAMAILIO 5.8.6,
Diversion:"Ale Gural"<sip:12345@10.10.16.2;user=phone>;reason=unconditional;privacy=off;counter=1;user-id="Ale@alegural.com"
when I use the $(hfl(Diversion)[0]) I got

Diversion:"Ale Gural"<sip:12345@10.10.16.2;user=phone>;reason=unconditional;privacy=off;counter=1;user-id="Ale@alegural.co

Is a Bug?

Thanks!

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 12:04 PM Benoit Panizzon <benoit.panizzon@imp.ch> wrote:

Hi

> Does anyone know why using $(hfl(Diversion)[0]) cuts off the last part of
> the value, while hdr doesn't?

$hfl tries to de-serialize comma (and probably semicolon) separated one
line header. So maybe it stumbles over something which causes it to
believe the last part belongs to another header?

Is he missing part in [1]?
What does the complete Diversion header causing the issue look like?

Mit freundlichen Grüssen

-Benoît Panizzon-
--
I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden
______________________________________________________

Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00
CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01
Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch
______________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com)
twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Consultancy, Training and Development Services -- asipto.com
Kamailio Scalability Training - Online, June 16-19, 2025 -- asipto.com
-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com)
twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Consultancy, Training and Development Services -- asipto.com
Kamailio Scalability Training - Online, June 16-19, 2025 -- asipto.com