14 Nov
2004
14 Nov
'04
1:09 a.m.
What I actually meant was using either rtpproxy with nathelper **OR** using mediaproxy.
I've had better success with mediaproxy because rtpproxy/nathelper seem to still
require users to
open UDP ports for SIP and RTP in their firewall whereas mediaproxy does not require end
users to
do anything to their firewall.
My experience has been that when using mediaproxy a STUN server isn't necessary,
although I'm have
some problems right now with sems/sipums voicemail because it is trying to send RTP media
to NATed
clients on non-routeable IP addresses.
Anyhow, when using rtpproxy with nathelper we've always had to allow specific UDP
ports on end
user firewalls.
Regards,
Paul
--- "Bruno Lopes F. Cabral" <bruno(a)openline.com.br> wrote:
Hi there
Java Rockx wrote:
http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ser/sip_router/etc/nathelper.cfg?…
Look at the <ser-source>/modules/rtpproxy
don't you mean modules/nathelper ? :-)
and <ser-source>/modules/mediaproxy
directories.
There are README files. Personally, I'd recommend using mediaproxy because it seems
to be more
effective with handling NATed clients. There is a sample cfg file in the mediaproxy
directory.
can comment on mediaproxy, but I'm using nathelper on
SER 0.8.14 with rtpproxy (from CVS, the tar linked on
voip-info.org don't work) and example found at
and it worked at first, like a charm
in fact, it worked so well that I'm still asking myself
if I was supposed to configure anything on clients to
make it work or not (i.e. Outbound proxy or Stun server
like in grandstream phones and adapters)
if anyone can enlight me on this, I'd appreciate
Cheers
!3runo
from Brazil
P.S. rtpproxy for SER 0.8.14 can be get with
cvs -d:pserver:anonymous@cvs.ser.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser co rtpproxy
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com