You need to make sure ser knows its public address using the
advertised_address and advertised_port directives.
g-)
Benito Caracuel wrote:
Hello all ,
This is my scenario:
I have SER with Private address behind a Cisco router which Has NAT implemented.
I have two UAs with public address each one.
UA1 ----------------------> Router Cisco with NAT (public IP)
------------------------> SER with private IP
UA2 <----------------------Router Cisco with NAT (public IP)
<------------------------ SER with private IP
The problem is that when UA1 sends an INVITE with SDP, UA2 reply with 200 ok with SDP but
after that, SER doesn't see the ACK. I know that UA1 sends the ACK but this ACK
doesn't reach SER.
I think that maybe the problem is NAT.
Is possible to run SER with private address?
How can i solve this?
Help me please.
Thank you very much.
Ben.
_________________________________________________________________
Consigue el nuevo Windows Live Messenger
http://get.live.com/messenger/overview_____________________________________…
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers