3 May
2005
3 May
'05
7:09 a.m.
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Juha Heinanen wrote:
should have been "in via header".
Nice idea, never thought of this before. But I see also some problems:
I was also surprised about the solutions like redirecting registers or routing options via ser-2, and they look quite promising at first glance. But unfortunately the former isn't supported by our (and a lot of others, I fear) UACs and the latter will result in quite a big hack, apart from the problems when one ser goes down and can't keep the nat binding opened. And both won't scale very well IMHO.
So maybe I'll have a look at an LVS solution after all to present only one public IP to the UACs.
Andy