Hi Jimmy,
from openser interaction, their are equivalent. SEMS uses fifo/unix_socket interface, Asterisk uses directly the SIP interface. Because of this, from script complexity point of view, I would say SEMS is more difficult to integrate than Asterisk. On the other hand Asterisk requires specific kernel versions and modules (you may need to recompile) for conference support. So......... :)
But you have to choose first based on service requirements, like codecs (sems doesn't support non-free codecs), conference scenarios - sems is note able to initiate a conference (users may just join), but Asterisk can do this.
so, strictly related to openser, I wouldn't say there is a better one - you should choose depending of how you want to build the conference service.
regards, bogdan
jimmy way wrote:
Hi all,
I want to use openser to create a conference system. It support more than 3 parties conferences. So I need an MCU support conference and only transfer the media stream(no mixed the voice) for the conference. I know that sems and asterisk support conference. Which is better for working with openser? How it works?
Best regards, Jimmy
____________________________________________________ Sell on Yahoo! Auctions – no fees. Bid on great items. http://auctions.yahoo.com/
Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users