Re: [Users] conference server

Hi Jimmy, from openser interaction, their are equivalent. SEMS uses fifo/unix_socket interface, Asterisk uses directly the SIP interface. Because of this, from script complexity point of view, I would say SEMS is more difficult to integrate than Asterisk. On the other hand Asterisk requires specific kernel versions and modules (you may need to recompile) for conference support. So......... :) But you have to choose first based on service requirements, like codecs (sems doesn't support non-free codecs), conference scenarios - sems is note able to initiate a conference (users may just join), but Asterisk can do this. so, strictly related to openser, I wouldn't say there is a better one - you should choose depending of how you want to build the conference service. regards, bogdan jimmy way wrote: