Hi Amit,
Sorry but I just saw that you use WS instead of WSS like me. I can only suggest to try it like this then but I w/o warranty because
I’m still learning about Kamailio and SIP:
route[WITHINDLG] {
if (!has_totag()) {
return;
}
if (loose_route()) {
if ($du == "") {
if (!handle_ruri_alias()) {
xlog("L_ERR", "Bad alias <$ru>\n");
sl_send_reply("400", "Bad Request");
exit;
}
}
if (is_method("BYE")) {
setflag(FLT_ACC);
setflag(FLT_ACCFAILED);
if (proto==WS && $ru=~"transport=ws") {
$ru = $tu;
lookup("location");
}
} else if (is_method("ACK")) {
if (proto==WS && $ru=~"transport=ws") {
$ru = $tu;
lookup("location");
}
}
route(RELAY);
} else {
if (is_method("ACK")) {
if (t_check_trans()) {
route(RELAY);
} else {
exit;
}
}
sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
}
exit;
}
Either way, SIP-Traces will help you a lot to find the wrong ACK-Handling and where it gets stuck.
Best Regards
Dimitry Nagorny
Trainee
Von: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org]
Im Auftrag von Amit Patkar
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016 15:53
An: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] WS to WS calls - No ACK received for 200OK
Thanks guys.
Yes. I have set advertised_address parameter.
I tried configuration changes suggested by Dimitry, but its now throwing following error and dropping call
Jun 21 19:07:15 acstemplate /usr/sbin/kamailio[7869]: ERROR: <core> [resolve.c:1693]: sip_hostport2su(): could not resolve hostname: "plfil8pkosnv.invalid"
Jun 21 19:07:15 acstemplate /usr/sbin/kamailio[7869]: ERROR: tm [ut.h:319]: uri2dst2(): failed to resolve "plfil8pkosnv.invalid"
Jun 21 19:07:15 acstemplate /usr/sbin/kamailio[7869]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1711]: t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: failure to add branches
Jun 21 19:07:15 acstemplate /usr/sbin/kamailio[7869]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: Unresolvable destination (478/SL)
Thanks & Regards,
Amit Patkar