2 May
2005
2 May
'05
12:13 p.m.
Hi!
Juha Heinanen wrote:
Andreas Granig writes:
Sorry for the misunderstanding. What I meant is:
UAC-1 sends a SIP-Register to SER-1, so NAT is opened for UAC-1 <->
SER-1. But since UAC-1 doesn't send something to SER-2, NAT is never
opened between UAC-1 and SER-2, which is what I meant with "no
NAT-binding". Because of this SER-2 can't send a SIP-Request to UAC-1
because it's blocked by the NAT-device.
Andy
But since there's no NAT-binding for UAC-1 to
SER-2, incoming calls from
SER-2 to UAC-1 can't work.
what do you mean by "there is no nat binding"?