17 Nov
2008
17 Nov
'08
7:46 p.m.
Yes, but shouldn't it go like this?
1. Caller makes a single call;
2. Kamailio forks INVITE to endpoint A and B;
3. Endpoint A responds with 200;
4. Kamailio CANCELs branch to B and passes back 200 from A to caller;
5. Caller sends ACK with tag in A's 200 reply.
Alex R.S.M wrote:
Caller make a single call, kamailio forks the INVITE
and relay the call
to two end-point. Both end-points response with 180.
One end-point reponses with 200. Caller send ACK with the incorrect tag
value.
I need to drop one of the 180 (the one which didn't answer the call).
I believe I should be able to drop it in onreply_route block. Correct?
--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:07:54 -0500
From: abalashov(a)evaristesys.com
To: alex_rsm(a)hotmail.com
CC: klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at; users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] incorrect tag in ACK message
Alex R.S.M wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Windows Live Hotmail now works up to 70% faster. Sign up today.
<http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_faster_112008>
Klaus,
Thank you for the response.
Found the problem.
I'd be curious to know what it was.
--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599