Re: [Serusers] REGISTER implementation --

No doubt in that. I really don't want that to be a SIP Proxy feature. But to add as a module like NAT, RTPProxy. I hope it is clear. The reason why it is needed: I cannot buy bulk of phones to have a phone for every sip proxy or even to pay too much for every additional sip uri. I feel it would be better to be done at the server side rather than at the sip endpoint. Asterisk needs a loads of changes to have the same implementation compared to SER. Kannaiyan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej(a)edvina.net> To: "Jan Janak" <jan(a)iptel.org> Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 7:41 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] REGISTER implementation -- > Jan Janak wrote: > > > What does that mean ? Do you want ser to be able to send a REGISTER > > message to another server ? If so then there is nobody implementing > > this. > And I can't really understand why a SIP proxy should. > > them. Asterisk is not a SIP proxy, but a good PBX that can originate > and terminate calls, both as a SIP UA Client and a SIP UA Server. > > /O > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > >