SER is a very good SIP proxy. A proxy sets up calls, doesn't terminate
No doubt in that.
I really don't want that to be a SIP Proxy feature. But to add as a module like NAT, RTPProxy. I hope it is clear.
The reason why it is needed: I cannot buy bulk of phones to have a phone for every sip proxy or even to pay too much for every additional sip uri. I feel it would be better to be done at the server side rather than at the sip endpoint.
Asterisk needs a loads of changes to have the same implementation compared to SER.
Kannaiyan
----- Original Message ----- From: "Olle E. Johansson" oej@edvina.net To: "Jan Janak" jan@iptel.org Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 7:41 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] REGISTER implementation --
Jan Janak wrote:
What does that mean ? Do you want ser to be able to send a REGISTER message to another server ? If so then there is nobody implementing this.
And I can't really understand why a SIP proxy should.
SER is a very good SIP proxy. A proxy sets up calls, doesn't terminate them. Asterisk is not a SIP proxy, but a good PBX that can originate and terminate calls, both as a SIP UA Client and a SIP UA Server.
/O
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers