Is it correct to use loose_route() along side the path module?
On 1 August 2016 at 13:33, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Yep, I've got the below in my kamailio.cfg
modparam("path", "use_received", 1)
Kind regards,
Luke
On 1 August 2016 at 13:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
On 01/08/16 14:14, Luke Milbourne wrote:
Hi all,
Currently trying to use Kamailio as a passthrough to some FreeSWITCH
boxes.
When receiving an invite from FreeSWITCH which contains a Route header
including received information, example below;
Route: <sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072>;lr;received=sip:[PUBLIC_IP]:45126
When using loose_route() Kamailio still send the invite to the rfc1918
address instead of the received IP:PORT in the Route header.
Am I misunderstanding how this should work?
if you use path module, have you enabled the option to use the received
parameter?
https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp38033932
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin
Mierlahttp://www.asipto.com -
http://www.kamailio.orghttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
--
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com