24 Nov
2003
24 Nov
'03
4:25 a.m.
Hi Greg,
We have multiple SER servers all accesing the same database. We had to
introduce a new "location" table for each instance of SER. So for example
we have a main SER server which acceses the standard "location" table and we
have another SER as RTPProxy which uses a table called "location_proxy". We
just created that custom table using the structure of the regular "location"
table.
Has been working great for us for several months.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Fausak" <greg(a)addaline.com>
To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2003 10:35 AM
Subject: [Serusers] multiple SER instances / REGISTRATION problem
I'd like to run multiple SER instances on the
same
database. I knew from previous experiments that
would not be possible because of the cache.
However, I just tried running multiple SER instances,
on the same database, but in different domains. This did
not work, they both wrote over each others location
entries in the database even though the domains on
each SER instance were different.
SER knows which domain it is in because of the
www_authorize("named.com", "subscriber")
authentication challenge.
So it seems reasonable that this instance of SER should only
mess with authorizations that it challenged. Perhaps the
problem is with the initial load of 'previous' registrations.
When SER starts, it loads the current location table. During
the load, ALL domains are loaded. Perhaps only the domains
listed by the 'alias="domain"' should be loaded and tracked,
and all of the rest should be ignored for each instance of SER?
---greg
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers