10 Dec
2003
10 Dec
'03
2:33 p.m.
Hi,
We are also having a problem with X-Pro and X-lite build 1088 when registering to a SIP
proxy based on libosip. The X-Pro is not using the double-quotes on the nonce value of the
Authorization header, which is causing an error on our proxy when parsing of this header
(Libosip requires the double quotes).
I have sent this question to the Xten support forum but they said that the double quotes
are not mandatory, though libosip requires them.
Any thoughts on what is the correct behaviour of the double-quotes on the authorization
header?
Thanks,
Chuck
########
REGISTER sip:sip.myproxy.com SIP/2.0..
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.0.0.118:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bK68B8733FC802462491336DC291698245..
From: 55519 <sip:55519@sip.myproxy.com>..
To: 55519 <sip:55519@sip.trd c.telenova.com.br>..
Contact: "55519" <sip:55519@10.0.0.118:5060>..
Call-ID: C6A03D06E92E4797964B8B66D428E345(a)sip.myproxy.com..
CSeq: 50473 REGISTER..Expires: 1800..
Authorization: Digest
username="55519",realm="sip.myproxy.com",nonce=3fc651184ade4892f2e774000507b
8b0a1db524e,response="19a55431e3ee1d5978c777373a822a40",uri="sip:sip.myproxy
.com"..
Max-Forwards: 70..
User-Agent: X-PRO build 1088..
Content-Length: 0....
Klaus Darilion <darilion(a)ict.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
PS: nevertheless build 1095 (as 1088) is IMO buggy as it doesn't
register to my default proxy, but to all other configured proxies. Any
solutions?
-----Original Message-----
From: Maxim Sobolev [mailto:sobomax@portaone.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 5:56 PM
To: Ricardo Villa
Cc: Klaus Darilion; Jan Janak; Adrian Georgescu; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Re: Xten-RTPProxy choppy audio
Ok, I see, probably it tries to send a RTCP packet, which is OK by
itself, but handles resulting ICMP in a strange way. I'll extend RTP
proxy to make it relaying RTCP traffic as well (I am having
it on a TODO
list for a quite some time now), which should fix this problem.
Thank you for the debugging!
In the meantime, disabling RTCP in X-Ten should solve the problem.
-Maxim
Ricardo Villa wrote:
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
I can confirm this too. Just tried it in our lab
with the
exact same
results as Klaus. (Instead of Budgetone I used
ATA186).
X-Lite build 1084
1. ATA186 Calls Xten.
2. Xten hears choppy audio every 5 seconds or so.
3. RTP Stream from ATA to Xten is perfect and conserves
the same SSRC
4. RTP Stream from Xten to ATA switches to a new
SSRC
every few seconds.
It is clear to me that there is a bug in Xten software. Before Xten
switches to a new SSRC it attempts to send an RTP packet to
the wrong RTP
Port (it tries to the actual port +1). SER server
sends
back "ICMP Port
Unreacheable (Obviously)" and Xten restarts
RTP Stream on a
new SSRC.
I did not see any problem with Maxims RTPProxy.
Regards,
Ricardo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Klaus Darilion"
To: "Jan Janak" ; "Adrian Georgescu"
Cc: ; "Ricardo Villa"
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:07 AM
Subject: RE: [Serusers] Re: Xten-RTPProxy choppy audio
I can reproduce the choppy audio
setup:
budgetone-100 <----> ser+rtpproxy(version from today) on
redhat 9 (or 8,
not sure) <------>x-lite build 1088 on win
xp
the choppy sound occours every 5 seconds, in both directions.
RTP-analysis:
RTP stream from budgetone to x-lite (via rtpproxy) is fine
(no jitter,
no loss)
RTP stream from x-lite to budgetone (via rtpproxy): very
strange: x-lite
switches to a new SSRC (and seq-nr. start at 0
again) every
5 seconds.
so, in my opinion: rtpproxy works fine, x-lite is guilty.
but why does
this happen only if the rtp proxy is involved?
...further
investigations
are planned...
Klaus
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jan Janak [mailto:janak@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:09 PM
>To: Adrian Georgescu
>Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org; Ricardo Villa
>Subject: Re: [Serusers] Re: Xten-RTPProxy choppy audio
>
>
>Well, we can generate the traces locally, but I haven't
encounter the
>problem you describe so it makes no sense.
>
>You wrote you are able to reproduce the problem, in that
case I would
like to
ask you to generate the traces that show the problem
so we could
analyze and fix it.
Also please tell us on what OS does this happen ? (I mean the
OS the proxy
is running on).
Another question, what is the license of your RTP proxy ? I
didn't find
any licensing info in the sources. Will the sources be available ?
Jan.
On 10-12 16:04, Adrian Georgescu wrote:
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
On Wednesday, Dec 10, 2003, at 15:48
Europe/Amsterdam,
Ricardo Villa
wrote:
>Adrian,
>
>Do you have an Etheral trace trace of such a call (using G711)?
I guess ethereal traces can be generated with ethereal program and
decoded locally on your servers if you want to isolate this.
>I can
>decode it and produce an audio file for all to examine.
This way we
>can get
>to the bottom of this.
>Thanks,
>Ricardo
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers