24 Apr
2010
24 Apr
'10
1:06 p.m.
Iñaki,
I would be curious to know what practical circumstances demand such a
convoluted topology.
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
1170 Peachtree Street
12th Floor, Suite 1200
Atlanta, GA 30309
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
On Apr 24, 2010, at 5:48 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net> wrote:
2010/4/24 Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com>om>:
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
If these rtpproxy use the same IP as the Kamailio's SIP signalling IP,
then there is no problem and no need to use "-r" flag. But my case is
more exotic as there is a transparent proxy between Kamailio-1 and
Kamailio-2, each one with its own RtpProxy not listening in same IP as
its Kamailio, and thre is also a transaparent SIP proxy between them
which, for some reason, removes the line "a=nortpproxy". In this case
both RtpProxy would handle the media and a deadlock would occur if
flag "-r" is not used because after some timeout both RtpProxy would
start relaying RTP to the IP of the transparent proxy (the prefilled
address when not using "-r" flag).
I've checked it.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users 1.6.4. force_rtp_proxy([flags [,
ip_address]])
-r flags that IP address in SDP should be trusted. Without
this
flag, nathelper
ignores address in the SDP and uses source address of the
SIP message
as media address which is passed to the RTP proxy.
i don't understand what chaining of rtpproxies has to do with
trusting
of ip addresses. my proxy can receive a request from anyone from the
internet and if that someone is behind nat and his proxy happens to
use
rtpproxy, then chaining with my rtpproxy does not work if some kind
of
trust relationship between these two proxies is needed.