Hello,
there were companies that pushed hundred thousands of active tls
connections to same kamailio and it went fine. You will have to do some
tuning to kamailio params as well as to the operating system limits, but
if you have powerful hardware, having such number of active tls
connections should be fine.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 27.02.19 11:30, Pintu Lohar wrote:
Hi Yasin,
Not yet tested, My bad - it's 0.1 million with TLS but yes we are yet
to test ), We need to distribute the users to different Kamailio
cluster through API server. However, Would like to try Option 2 as
well and test with it.
Regards
Pintu Lohar
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 7:16 PM YASIN CANER <caner_yaso(a)hotmail.com
<mailto:caner_yaso@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Hello Pintu
1 million TLS user? Have u ever test with tester on Kamailio
?Because I remembered in sr-mails that an user tested on 1000
client on TLS transport , it consumes so much CPU etc . I guess 1
milliyonTLSUser make big impact your system for all registration/call.
I tested option-2 for relaying registers about 1-2 years ago for
proof of concept. It works fine.
you can replicate user location data by Dmq_usrloc module and can
use path header then build a triangle topology to bridge calls.
Or
You can build a Location Information service to find which
kamailio has UAC data .
Best Regards.
Yasin CANER
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Pintu Lohar <pintulohargcetts(a)gmail.com
<mailto:pintulohargcetts@gmail.com>>
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 27, 2019 12:27 PM
*To:* YASIN CANER
*Cc:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
*Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT or With Public IP -
Which one is highly recommended
Hi Yasin,
Thanks indeed for your valuable input for the
active-active cluster(Option-1) & Option-2
We definitely would like to try setting up an
active-active cluster for the next phase if not in current phase.
But In order to use Kamailio in the active-active cluster, I
think we need to forward or replicate registration to both the
active-active server?
in order to proxy the invite packet through the server where the
UA is registered?
We use the following use cases :
1. We use FCM and APNS push to wake up the app.
2. Multi forking / Late forking cases are also involved.
3. Using Kamailio as a stateful proxy.
Thanks & Regards
Pintu
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 3:10 PM YASIN CANER
<caner_yaso(a)hotmail.com <mailto:caner_yaso@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
My suggestion is that stay away from NAT if you dont have to.
various sip client/Firewalls make out troubles for
registration and invites, even if Kamailio can handle it. If
you have a high load TLS connection / subscriber , I think you
should use load balancer and NAT options.
For example;
1 - Load balancer like F5 that balancing your connection
active-active Kamailios
UAC ----> F5 ------> Kamailio -1 (advertises public IP)
|
-------> Kamailio -2 (advertises public IP)
2- Use kamailio as MultiHomed that convert transport layer to
tcp/udp
UAC ---------> Kamailio(TLS-PUBLIC IP-mhomed) ------->
Kamailio-1(TCP/UDP)
|
---------> Kamailio-2(TCP/UDP)
Good luck
Yasin CANER
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org>> on behalf of
Pintu Lohar <pintulohargcetts(a)gmail.com
<mailto:pintulohargcetts@gmail.com>>
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 26, 2019 8:09 AM
*To:* sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
*Subject:* [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT or With Public IP -
Which one is highly recommended
Hi Everyone,
Which one among the below option is highly recommended for
setting up Kamailio (for production)
1. Kamailio behind NAT *or*
2. Setting up Kamailio using public IP?
are there any disadvantages if we setup Kamailio behind NAT
and use advertise option in listen parameters?
We have tested both the options, and both the options work
great for us( a. Kamailio behind NAT with advertising in
listen parameters b.Kamailio setup with public IP). So
wondering which one is best and highly recommended?
Some extra info :
1. We use TLS
2. Using coturn for media
Thanks
Pintu
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla --
www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 --
www.kamailioworld.com
Kamailio Advanced Training - Mar 4-6, 2019 in Berlin; Mar 25-27, 2019, in Washington, DC,
USA --
www.asipto.com