db_new_result->pkg_malloc(qm_malloc)->qm_find_free, func qm_find_free
return 0, can not find mem when i close memdbg.
2014-10-20 18:57 GMT+08:00 张顺通 <shuntongzhang(a)gmail.com>om>:
rhel5
$cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep name | cut -f2 -d: | uniq -c
24 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430 0 @ 2.20GHz
rhel6
cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep name | cut -f2 -d: | uniq -c
16 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz
not Embedded device, normal server.
gdb
(gdb) f 2
#2 0x0000000000615b74 in qm_debug_frag (qm=0x7ffff6c55010,
f=0x7ffff6cdcf08) at mem/q_malloc.c:161
161 abort();
(gdb) p *f
$1 = {size = 7831720, u = {nxt_free = 0x7ffff6c893f8, is_free =
140737333728248}, file = 0x7ffff6a4c93d "db_mysql: km_my_con.c",
func = 0x758307 "fragm. from qm_malloc", line = 62, check =
4042322160}
2014-10-20 18:30 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
:
> physical machine is the same? Is it standard OS installation, or some
> customizations (e.g. custom kernel modules, etc.)? Embedded device? What
> CPU?
>
> Daniel
>
>
> On 20/10/14 12:24, 张顺通 wrote:
>
> os is rhel.
> rhel6 is ok, rhel5 can not start.
>
> 2014-10-20 18:11 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
> >:
>
>> What are the differences between the server that works and the one
>> that doesn't? I mean hardware and operating system details?
>>
>> Checking quickly the source code and comparing with logs, it doesn't
>> reveal any problem -- it is about allocation of the next fragment, which
>> was not used at all before, after the one allocated previously. The only
>> reason I can think of it right now is corrupted memory or faulty OS.
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 20/10/14 11:56, 张顺通 wrote:
>>
>> 4.2 have the same problem.
>> at begin i use 4.1, i think this is a bug in 4.1; then i use 4.2 to
>> check to see if the problem is solved. problems still in.
>>
>> see ka_4_2_0.log
>>
>> ka_4_2_0.log
>>
<https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5x1TDtoeVvAckdMbDRmT3E3UjA/edit?usp=drive_web>
>>
>>
>> 2014-10-20 17:48 GMT+08:00 张顺通 <shuntongzhang(a)gmail.com>om>:
>>
>>> ka.log is genrate by kamailio 4.1.6.
>>>
>>> 2014-10-20 17:44 GMT+08:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
>>> miconda(a)gmail.com>gt;:
>>>
>>>> Are you using 4.1 or 4.2?
>>>>
>>>> Because the subject mentioned 4.2 but the version of kamailio is 4.1
>>>>
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>> On 20/10/14 11:39, 张顺通 wrote:
>>>> > -M 12 can not help. all config is same.
>>>> >
>>>> > see ka.log in attachment, kamailio version is 4.1.6
>>>> >
>>>> > version: kamailio 4.1.6 (x86_64/linux) 010d57
>>>> >
>>>> > flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS,
>>>> > DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP,
>>>> PKG_MALLOC,
>>>> > DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE,
>>>> > USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
>>>> >
>>>> > ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN
>>>> 16,
>>>> > MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB
>>>> >
>>>> > poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
>>>> >
>>>> > id: 010d57
>>>> >
>>>> > compiled on 16:48:03 Oct 20 2014 with gcc 4.1.2
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>>>
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin
Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>
>>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin
Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>