Thanks for the info. The thing to keep in mind with ser-0.9.x is that I belive extra debug information is still enabled in the Makefile.
Regards, Paul
On Apr 7, 2005 12:41 PM, Steve Blair blairs@isc.upenn.edu wrote:
Paul:
Two things are getting me right now both are errors with serctl. The main problem is the inability to add/delete aliases. It seems SER remembers the previously defined alias but serctl will not delete it. Therefore I cannot replace that alias with a new one.
One other annoying issue is the copious amount of log messages that are written to syslog when the server is shutdown. It is so bad I've actually stored up several changes, schedule an outage, reboot the entire machine, implement the changes and hope I haven't made a mistake.
I'd have to check on the version but I think it is 0.9.1 and the last checkout was about one week ago.
Java Rockx wrote:
Steve,
Can you give a few examples of the "odd little behaviors" you see with ser-0.9?
Also, are you using 0.9.0 or 0.9.1. If 0.9.1, how recent was your CVS checkout?
Regards, Paul
On Apr 7, 2005 6:24 AM, *Steve Blair* <blairs@isc.upenn.edu mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu> wrote:
Rod:
Overall I'd say yes. The avp functionality has been the biggest win for us. We still have several odd little behaviors some of which are actually bugs. This is a little unnerving on production systems but we are using the 0.9.0 release anyway.
-Steve
Rod Bacon wrote:
I understand that the latest "stable" release is still 0.8.14, but what are peoples general experiences with 0.9.0?
Is it worth the upgrade?
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
ISC Network Engineering The University of Pennsylvania 3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A Philadelphia, PA 19104
voice: 215-573-8396
215-746-8001
fax: 215-898-9348
sip:blairs@upenn.edu