21 Dec
2006
21 Dec
'06
12:20 p.m.
Hello Klaus,
On 12/21/06 12:05, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi Daniel!
I've checked the postgres script: rel_1_1_0 works fine, but there is a
problem in unstable: The domain for the default admin user is asked
not for serweb tables but for the plain openser tables as well. Also
the subscriber table includes all the serweb columns even if serweb
tables are not installed.
I think a merge with mysql version, with an option to say
the
underlaying DB engine is the right solution, to be easy to maintain --
same as we did with openserctl. I will have that in mind, but the best
will be to register it to tracker.
Cheers,
Daniel
regards
klaus
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
On 12/20/06 19:36, Mark Price wrote:
On 12/20/06, *Klaus Darilion* < klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at
<mailto:klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at>> wrote:
Hi Mark!
Postgres should work well - I use it since ser 0.8. Just make sure
that
the hard disk does not get full, because this breaks the index
inside
postgres and postgres is getting real slow (re-create the index
if it
happens).
Last time I tested openser_postgres.sh it worked fine. If you find
a bug
please let us know.
Please check to use the latest versions from CVS (for 1.1 use CVS
rel_1_1_0)
The latest version from cvs doesn't work out of the box with openser
build from the release tarball, because the release tarball doesn't
included /usr/sbin/openser_gen_ha1 (although I could get past this
by replacing it with the md5sum equivelant).
However, the release tarball doesn't work because of this bug:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=151873…
<https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1518732&group_id=139143>
So, 1. is the cvs version of rel_1_1_0 considered safe for
production use?
yes, it is the most recommended version to use -- several issues were
found and fixed since 1.1.0 release.
2. if so and there are important fixes such
as this in CVS,
would openser.org <http://openser.org> consider
releasing a point release containing such changes?
It is an option, and
perhaps should be taken in consideration, as
patch release with not so much packaging.
This may help some which want to maintain platforms updated, it is
exampled with 1.0.x, bust just replace the version with 1.1.0 in the
document and should work (rel_1_0_0 => rel_1_1_0)
http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/install:openser-from-cvs
Cheers,
Daniel
Thanks,
Mark Price
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users