Re: [SR-Users] FW: Client site NAT negotiation with no STUN.

On Friday 14 February 2014 10:18:07 Rob Moore wrote: You failed, it's not beatifull, it's a mess (be sure to use a monospaced font and spaces when drawing ASCII art (since not all clients use monospaced to display it will always fail in some clients)). See http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2014-February/081601.html for the result as I've seen your art :) I learned to never trust anything a client tells me in a SIP message, forcing all rtp through the rtpproxy only leaves firewall issues at the client IMHO. On an SBC kind of setup just always call rtpproxy_manage() regardless wheter you detect a natted client. In the "default" kamailio.conf just move rtpproxy_manage in the route[NATMANAGE] to the beginning of the route (the f to use the local rtpproxy even if an other rtpproxy is detected) # RTPProxy control route[NATMANAGE] { #!ifdef WITH_NAT rtpproxy_manage("f"); if (is_request()) { .... -- POCOS B.V. - Croy 9c - 5653 LC Eindhoven Telefoon: 040 293 8661 - Fax: 040 293 8658 http://www.pocos.nl/ - http://www.sipo.nl/ K.v.K. Eindhoven 17097024