12 Dec
2003
12 Dec
'03
3:03 a.m.
Hrm. force_rport() eh ? Can't seem to find this in the manual.
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Dec 11, 2003 at 10:41, Klaus Darilion
<darilion(a)ict.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
--
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Jim Burwell - Sr. Systems/Network/Security Engineer, JSBC |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| "I never let my schooling get in the way of my education." - Mark Twain |
| "UNIX was never designed to keep people from doing stupid things, because |
| that policy would also keep them from doing clever things." - Doug Gwyn |
| "Cool is only three letters away from Fool" - Mike Muir, Suicyco |
| "..Government in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst |
| state an intolerable one.." - Thomas Paine, "Common Sense" (1776)
|
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Email: jimb(a)jsbc.cc ICQ UIN: 1695089 |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Reply problems ? Turn off the "sign" function in email prog. Blame MS. |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Of course your right! I misunderstood the question
and talked about
ser's port.
In addition, if the Via header includes the "rport" parameter, then ser
will send the request to the port from which the request was sent -
useful for NAT traversal.
Or if you use force_rport(); in the ser config (ser will add rport and
behave as if rport was present in the original message).
Andrei
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers