Alex Balashov writes:
I use SEMS myself and like it very much. It’s sad to see it fall away and I regret that I personally lack the resources to prop it up. Nevertheless, I think it’s a fact that it’s not a dependable input in a future-proof way for lack of active public development and (much) maintenance. I think in the most optimistic view it is merely “very unpolished”.
I too feel sad that SEMS development has stalled to minimal maintenance level. I have written numerous applications from scratch using SEMS's DSM scripts (call center, conference, voicemail, ivr apps, charging, ...) plus I'm using some of its SBC capabilities. As long as there is no alternative, for me it is the only way to go.
-- Juha