Alex Balashov writes:
I use SEMS myself and like it very much. It’s sad to
see it fall away
and I regret that I personally lack the resources to prop it
up. Nevertheless, I think it’s a fact that it’s not a dependable input
in a future-proof way for lack of active public development and (much)
maintenance. I think in the most optimistic view it is merely “very
unpolished”.
I too feel sad that SEMS development has stalled to minimal maintenance
level. I have written numerous applications from scratch using SEMS's
DSM scripts (call center, conference, voicemail, ivr apps, charging,
...) plus I'm using some of its SBC capabilities. As long as there is
no alternative, for me it is the only way to go.
-- Juha