6 Nov
2008
6 Nov
'08
11:06 p.m.
My apologies for the drawing. Openser is receiving the 487 from the
SBC, ACKing back to the SBC and then passing the 487 to the UAC and
the the UAC ACK's back to Openser. At which time the error occurs
because the ACK will not be forwarded since it already ACK'd for the
487 to the SBC.
-Kyle
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:42 PM, <ingdavidcespedes(a)cable.net.co> wrote:
The final 487 should go from openser to UAC, not from
SBC to UAC. That's why the final ACK is getting lost, because it was allready
ACK'd by openser.
----- Mensaje original -----
De: Krom <kyle.romulas(a)gmail.com>
Fecha: Jueves, Noviembre 6, 2008 1:18 pm
Asunto: Re: [Kamailio-Users] CANCEL and 487 Request Terminated
--
Thanks,
-- Kyle
Klaus,
Some additional information. After viewing a trace I can see that the
error is being generated from the last ACK received from the UAC.
OpenSER/Kamailio is ACK'ing to the 487 from the PSTN provider and then
relaying the 487 to the UAC which in turn ACK's back. It is the last
ACK from the UAC that is getting the error on t_relay. I can assume
because the ACK to the 487 was already sent by OpenSER/Kamailio to the
PSTN upon receiving the initial 487. Something in the script I can
change to prevent this or just ignore the error and move on. :-)
UAC OSER SBC
CANCEL ---> |
CANCEL ---> |
<--- 200 canceling
| <--- 200 OK
| <--- 487 Request Terminated
ACK --->
<--- 487 Reqest Terminated
ACK ---> |
Regards,
-Kyle
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Krom <kyle.romulas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
--
Thanks,
-- Kyle
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Klaus,
Thank you for the reply and the link. The link help in checking my
work. My script is very simple and even checking against the
compiled>
scripted from sipwise.com the error persists.
Here is my CANCEL and ACK handling.
if(is_method("CANCEL") || is_method("ACK")) {
if(t_check_trans()) {
if(!t_relay()) sl_reply_error();
}
exit;
}
Here is my route block for PSTN calls.
route[4]
{
if (!load_gws()) {
sl_send_reply("500", "Server Internal Error");
exit;
}
if (!next_gw()) {
sl_send_reply("503", "Service Unavailable");
exit;
}
t_on_failure("2");
t_relay("udp:<IPADDR>:5060"); # Relay to the Session Boarder
Controller>
exit;
}
Here is my failure route.
failure_route[2]
{
if(t_check_status("408|500|503")) {
if (!next_gw()) {
t_reply("503", "Service Unavailable");
exit;
}
t_on_failure("2");
t_relay("udp:<IPADDR>:5060"); # Relay to the Session Boarder
Controller> }
exit;
}
Any thoughts or errors you see?
Regards.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Klaus Darilion
<klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote:
> looks like the ACK is miss-routed.
>
> Usually calling t_relay() for ACK is sufficient (take a look at
the config
> file generated with sipwise.com wizard for
correct CANCEL/ACK
handling.>>
> regards
> klaus
>
> Krom schrieb:
>>
>> Et al,
>>
>> Version: openser-1.1.1-notls
>>
>> I am receiving the following after calling t_relay within the
default>>> route block.
>> ERROR: t_newtran: transaction already in
process 0xb0139638
>> WARNING:sl:sl_send_reply: I won't send a reply for ACK!!
>> WARNING: script writer didn't release transaction
>>
>> This is happening when a downstream UAC dials outbound to the
PSTN and
>> then terminates the call prior to the far
ending answering.
>>
>> UAC send a CANCEL to the proxy, the proxy responds to the UAC
with a
>> '200 canceling' and forwards the
CANCEL to the PSTN provider.
>> The PSTN provider sends 487 Request Terminated to the proxy and
the>>> proxy sends it on to the UAC. UAC responds with an ACK to
the proxy.
>
> Is this an issue? How do I handle this dialog withou getting the
> t_relay error message?
>
>
--
Thanks,
-- Kyle