Message: 4
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:29:35 +0500
From: SamyGo <govoiper@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy module issue
To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -
        Users   Mailing List" <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Message-ID:
        <CAJUJwtjB7fmm1pa60wJMLPPte=Qu_AeZ1z2aqysQaZch_Pb+dQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi,

Though not an expert, I got few things in mind for your case. In the
upgrade process the modules folder remain the same ? right ! if that is so
is there any chances that the new installation skipped installation of
newer rtpproxy module and hence the old version rtpproxy module could've
been left in place. That could be a reason for not identifying the older
module.
This whole speculation could be wrong if the newer version supports the
older version modules.

BR
Sammy


On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:56 AM, phillman25 <phillman25@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear List
>
> I have just upgraded from kamailio V3.2.2 to kamailio V 3.3.1
> However, when trying to start kamailio its giving me the below error:
>
>
> ERROR: <core> [sr_module.c:572]: ERROR: load_module: could not open module
> </usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules_k/rtpproxy.so>:
> /usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules_k/rtpproxy.so: undefined symbol: qm_realloc
> : <core> [cfg.y:3591]: parse error in config file
> /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 245, column 12-24: failed to
> load module
>
>
> Does anyone know why rtpproxy module cannot be loaded?
>
>
> This is the output of ldd /usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules_k/rtpproxy.so:
>
>
>
> shell-init: error retrieving current directory: getcwd: cannot access
> parent directories: No such file or directory
>         linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0x00276000)
>         libkmi.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/kamailio/libkmi.so.1 (0x00b64000)
>         libkcore.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/kamailio/libkcore.so.1 (0x00768000)
>         libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0x00277000)
>         /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00114000)
>
>
>
> Regards Phillip
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20120816/919fdda5/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:45:57 +0200
From: Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Is Route Header in SIP Invite Mandatory?
To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -
        Users   Mailing List" <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Message-ID: <502CC155.5030603@pernau.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

On 16.08.2012 09:40, Apoorv Khare wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Does Kamailio has a mandatory requirement for SIP Invite to have Route
> header? Although RFC-3261 doesn't have.

Kamailio does not have a requirement on Route headers. Although you can
check manually for a Router header and handle requests different.

> My requirement is to take out route header from the client if I do that
> I don't see PRACK being send out from Kamilio to Media GW which causes
> call drop eventually in 15sec. Any thoughts..........

Maybe you can re-phrase your problem. I didn't understand it.

regards
Klaus



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


End of sr-users Digest, Vol 87, Issue 52
****************************************