27 Sep
2004
27 Sep
'04
11:51 p.m.
I saw those discussions as well. Apparently it is Mark Spencer's best
interest to discourage people using it. I am not the right person to
interpret the law, as well as Mark.
Just like Intel's solution is for educational purpose and not breaking any
law, the adaptation of it to * or sems is no different, in my understanding.
G729 is an international standard. I don't think that it is a problem for
implementing it. It is end users' responsibility to pay the license fee for
commercial use. If there is any doubt, Intel's lawyers should be able to
understand the consequences of releasing the code.
Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: Girish [mailto:gr_sh2003@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 12:48 AM
To: Richard
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] open source g729
Hi,
I have been following that thread on the * mailing list, i am not sure
about the licencing issues,
but this is what Mr. Mark Spencer, the creator of Asterisk has said about
that:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-
September/064099.html
Regards,
=====
Girish Gopinath <gr_sh2003(a)yahoo.com>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Intel has an open source code for g729. This
sample supports the ITU-T
G.729
Recommendation and Annexes A, B, D and E.
Someone has adapted this with *. Is it possible to integrate this with
sems?