3 May
2005
3 May
'05
6:55 a.m.
Juha Heinanen wrote:
the other option might be to make ser-1 to send an options request to uac-1 using ser-2's address in contact.
should have been "in via header".
Nice idea, never thought of this before. But I see also some problems:
1. If the client is configured to use symmetric signaling, it will send the response back to ser-1.
2. If the client sends the response back to ser-2, the port on the NAT may be different than the port for communicating with ser-1. Thus, the replicated location (port) stored in ser-2 will be different to the NAT binding for ser-2.
regards, klaus