Re: [Serusers] acc module not recording bye and ack messages.

If you cancel the call on the caller side then there is no BYE, it will send CANCEL instead.

Jan.

On 02-07 10:22, varala ramakanth wrote:

hello friends,

iam using this one two port fxs and one xlite softphone

in my acc database i observed that only if the called

party cancels the session then only bye messages are

recording in databases if calling party i.e destinatin

cancels the calls no record of bye messages in the

acc

from fxs if we ring to the softphone only invites

are recording not any other i.e no bye and ack messages

where may be the problem

my config file is

---

# ----------- global configuration parameters

debug=8 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=yes log_stderror=yes # (cmd line: -E)

/* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode fork=no log_stderror=yes */

check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) port=5060 children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"

# ------------------ module loading

# Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/exec.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/domain.so"

# Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_radius.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/acc.so"

# !! Nathelper loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so"

# ----------------- setting module-specific parameters

# -- usrloc params --

#modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0)

# Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2)

# -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # #modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), # uncomment also the following parameter) # #modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password")

modparam("auth_radius","radius_config","/root/radiusclient.conf") modparam("auth_radius","service_type",15)

modparam("acc", "log_level", 1) modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1) modparam("acc", "db_flag", 1) modparam("acc", "db_missed_flag", 2) modparam("acc", "log_fmt", "miocfst") modparam("acc", "failed_transactions" ,1) modparam("acc", "radius_flag", 1)

# -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)

# !! Nathelper modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6) modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) # Ping interval 30 s modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # Ping only clients behind NAT

# ------------------------- request routing logic

# main routing logic

route{

    # initial sanity checks -- messages with
    # max_forwards==0, or excessively long

requests

    if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
            sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
            break;
    };

    if (msg:len >=  max_len ) {
            sl_send_reply("513", "Message too

big"); break; };

    # !! Nathelper
    # Special handling for NATed clients; first,

NAT test is # executed: it looks for via!=received and RFC1918 addresses # in Contact (may fail if line-folding is used); also, # the received test should, if completed, should check all # vias for rpesence of received if (nat_uac_test("3")) { # Allow RR-ed requests, as these may indicate that # a NAT-enabled proxy takes care of it; unless it is # a REGISTER

            if (method == "REGISTER" || !

search("^Record-Route:")) { log("LOG: Someone trying to register from private IP, rewriting\n");

                # This will work only for user

agents that support symmetric # communication. We tested quite many of them and majority is # smart enough to be symmetric. In some phones it takes a configuration # option. With Cisco 7960, it is called NAT_Enable=Yes, with kphone it is # called "symmetric media" and "symmetric signalling".

                fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite

contact with source IP of signalling if (method == "INVITE") { fix_nated_sdp("1"); # Add direction=active to SDP }; force_rport(); # Add rport parameter to topmost Via setflag(6); # Mark as NATed }; }; setflag(1); setflag(2); # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route();

    # subsequent messages withing a dialog should

take the # path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; };

    if (!uri==myself) {
            # mark routing logic in request
            append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n");
            route(1);
            break;
    };

    # if the request is for other domain use

UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) # if (uri==myself) {

# if (method=="REGISTER") { #cdr tool

           if ( method == "REGISTER" ||

method=="INVITE" || method=="BYE" || method == "CANCEL" ) { # save messages in mysql for CDRTool

exec_msg("/usr/local/etc/ser/sertrace.py; exit 1"); };

#end of cdrtool

# Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication if (uri==myself) {

                    if (method=="REGISTER")
                            {

                            if

(!radius_www_authorize("")) {

www_challenge("", "0"); break; };

                            save("location");
                            break;
                            };


    if (method=="INVITE") {
            log(1, "INVITE\n");
             setflag(1); /* set for accounting

(the same value as in log_flag!) */ };

     if (method=="MESSAGE") {
             log(1, "MESSAGE\n");
             setflag(1); /* set for accounting

(the same value as in log_flag!) */ };

     if ( method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL" ) {
             log (1, "BYE or CANCEL\n");
             setflag(1);
     };








            lookup("aliases");
            if (!uri==myself) {
                    append_hf("P-hint: outbound

alias\r\n"); route(1); break; };

            # native SIP destinations are handled

using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); route(1); }

route[1] { # !! Nathelper if (uri=~"[@:](192.168.|10.|172.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1]).)" && !search("^Route:")){ sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to private IP addresses"); break; };

    # if client or server know to be behind a NAT,

enable relay if (isflagset(6)) { force_rtp_proxy(); };

    # NAT processing of replies; apply to all

transactions (for example, # re-INVITEs from public to private UA are hard to identify as # NATed at the moment of request processing); look at replies t_on_reply("1");

    # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as

it works reliably # even for UDP2TCP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; }

# !! Nathelper onreply_route[1] { # NATed transaction ? if (isflagset(6) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") { fix_nated_contact(); force_rtp_proxy(); # otherwise, is it a transaction behind a NAT and we did not # know at time of request processing ? (RFC1918 contacts) } else if (nat_uac_test("1")) { fix_nated_contact(); }; }

so kindly help me

with regards rama kanth

__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

---

Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers