Re: [Sems] Re: [Serusers] SER & SEMS on separate machines

you may also try to put the email address in the forwarded request at

At 12:58 PM 1/27/2006, sip wrote: >SER and SEMS of SOME sort must be on the same machine, but it doesn't

>be your main SER. I have a copy of SER running on a separate machine

>that is pared down considerable and does nothing but handle SEMS

>main SER server forwards calls onto the SER/SEMS server (on a different >machine) for the sake of performance. > >You DO have to have a copy of at least the subscriber table (or, really,

>PARTS of the subscriber table) for the voicemail app to work as it grabs

>email address. > >Your choices are to either have a DB url that points to the original DB

>replicate your subscriber info to two different tables. > >We chose the latter. On creation of a user account, we have a trigger

>replicates the subscriber info to a separate DB on the SER/SEMS machine. >During testing, however, we had it originally set up to just point to

>original DB and noticed no real performance hit. > >N. > >On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:00:08 +0100, samuel wrote > > >>I think SER and SEMS must be on the same machine becasue they use >>FIFO or UNIX socket to interact. >> >>Sam. >>2006/1/27, Amos M. Nungu <amos.nungu(a)gmail.com>om>: >> >> >>>Hello members, >>> >>>I have SER and SEMS on the same machine and it works fine. For >>>performance reasons, I would like to them to be on separate machines. >>> >>>My query is the fact that SEMS uses the email address from the >>>subscriber table in SER db. Do I need to have SER db on the machine >>>where SEMS is running (means 2 identical dbs) or how can I achieve

-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/