Hi,
it should be possible to use PA without XCAP server (or its simulation).
The parameter of pa module still should work. What do you mean with the
latest SER version (this is in CVS at least since November; it is in
"presence snapshots" too)?
In the config in handling PUBLISH request call handle_publish instead of
handle_subscription.
Vaclav
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 05:10:38PM +0100, Akeru Ikena wrote:
Hi all,
Now that my routing problems seems to be gone, I ran into some presence
issue.
It seems the presence mechanism is working well, meaning I created the DB
tables to store the informations, I added some lines in my conf (see below)
and now I'd like my users to be able to send presence info each other
WITHOUT an xcap server.
I naturally wanted to add modparam("pa", "auth", "none").
But, as I
understood, it seems this option is no longer exported in the lastest SER
Version.
So, how can I do ? Is it now mandatory to have an xcap server running ?
Thanks alot.
if (method == "SUBSCRIBE") {
# create transaction state; abort if error occured
xlog("L_INFO", "\n[SER]: --SUBSCRIBE--: Time:
[%Tf]
Method: <%rm> R-uri: <%ru> Contact Header: <%ct> From: <%fu> To
<%tu>\n\n");
if ( !t_newtran()) {
sl_reply_error();
break;
};
if(!handle_subscription("registrar")) {
sl_reply_error();
break;
};
break;
};
if (method == "PUBLISH") {
# create transaction state; abort if error occured
xlog("L_INFO", "\n[SER]: --PUBLISH--: Time: [%Tf]
Method: <%rm> R-uri: <%ru> Contact Header: <%ct> From: <%fu> To
<%tu>
\n\n");
if ( !t_newtran()) {
sl_reply_error();
break;
};
if(!handle_subscription("registrar")) {
sl_reply_error();
break;
};
break;
};
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers