On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 15:44 +0300, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
jiri,
that is incorrect information - there was no plan / need / acceptance
for the port you are mentioning.
I thing you realize that the TM+timer code from SER and OpenSER is
following different direction of development, which makes quite
unrealistic your sayings.
HA ! I understand better now, I almost got confused :-)