11 Jun
2005
11 Jun
'05
1:48 a.m.
Hi Marian,
Thank you taking the time to answer my question. The serial forking example
is exactly what I need. Is there a sample "set_fork_list()" function that
you can point me to?
Regards,
Dmitry
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marian Dumitru" <marian.dumitru(a)voice-sistem.ro>
To: "Dmitry Isakbayev" <isakdim(a)gmail.com>
Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] How to execute failure_route block by the same child
process.
Hi Dimitry,
you don't need to implement anything else for serial forking - it's
already there. Take a look to this example which shows a way to do it:
http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/ar01s08.html#ex_serial_forking
about your question - no, is not possible. If you want to store some
information from main route and used in failure_route use AVPs. (see
avpops module)
http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/
regards,
Marian
Dmitry Isakbayev wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to implement sequential forking using to_on_failure and
failure_route blocks. Is there a way to configure SER or tm module to
execute the 'failure-route' blocks using the same process as was used for
executing the main route script? If it was possible, I would not need to
share state information between different SER processes
Thank you in advance,
Dmitry
--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro